The decisions register
The concluded rulings of the courts of Octavium, published in full. 21 on the record.
| Published | Date | Court | Case and holding | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JMO-0089 | 2026-10-26 | Appeals Court | cohan99101 v The State appeal · field jail for Murder · teammate shooting · chat log admissions · missing video The appeal is dismissed because the chat logs and arrest booking record show admissions of an intentional shooting and the unavailable video could not refute that evidence. |
THE APPEAL IS DISMIS… |
| JMO-0088 | 2026-10-25 | Appeals Court | cohan99101 v The State Appeal allowed; defendant acquitted because the State failed to prove the offense's elements and the arrest lacked lawful basis. |
NOT GUILTY |
| JMO-0087 | 2026-10-25 | Appeals Court | larpations v The State Appeals The court found the appellant not guilty under rule 8.1.4 because the appeal was timely and the record showed the punishments were improperly imposed. |
NOT GUILTY |
| JMO-0086 | 2026-10-24 | Appeals Court | ebupro9093 v The State Withdrawn with the approval of the court |
WITHDRAWN |
| JMO-0085 | 2026-10-22 | Appeals Court | larpations v The State Appeals Thrown out before trial |
THROWN OUT BEFORE TR… |
| JMO-0084 | 2026-10-21 | Appeals Court | laki648974 v The State appeal · permanent game ban · duplicate filing · technical lockout Appeal allowed in part; permanent game ban lifted because Ministry records showed it had already been lifted and the continued lockout was a technical fault. |
THE APPEAL IS ALLOWE… |
| JMO-0083 | 2026-10-21 | Appeals Court | laki648974 v The State appeal · permanent game ban · ban lifted in ban book · technical failure · game unban Appeal allowed; the permanent game ban was lifted because the Imperium’s records show the ban had been revoked and the continued lockout resulted from a technical fault. |
THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED. |
| JMO-0081 | 2026-10-20 | Appeals Court | TGYYN v The State appeal deadline · field punishment · loyalty jacks · untimely filing The appeal is dismissed because it was filed more than twenty four hours after the field punishment was issued, exceeding the statutory appeal deadline. |
THE APPEAL IS DISMIS… |
| JMO-0080 | 2026-10-20 | Appeals Court | DivineJovile v The State appeal · loyalty jacks · Event Watch · strike two in thirty days · missing proof of second strike The appeal is allowed because the State did not prove a second distinct faulty #events shout within thirty days, so the loyalty jacks entry P-4283 is set aside. |
THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED. |
| JMO-0078 | 2026-10-19 | Appeals Court | efsdggftfcgfv v The State appeal · disciplinary jacks · Discord event shout format · evidence standard The appeal is allowed because the Event Watch punishment is not adequately supported by the record and the procedural and evidentiary requirements for review were not satisfied. |
THE APPEAL IS ALLOWED. |
| JMO-0076 | 2026-10-19 | Appeals Court | ebupro9093 v The State appeal withdrawal · no counts charged · field punishment The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn because the appellant expressly abandoned the appeal and the record shows no reason to decide the merits. |
THE APPEAL IS DISMIS… |
| JMO-0074 | 2026-10-18 | Appeals Court | larpations v The State Defamation Withdrawn with the approval of the court |
WITHDRAWN |
| JMO-0075 | 2026-10-12 | Appeals Court | cohan99101 v The State Withdrawn with the approval of the court |
WITHDRAWN |
| JMO-0072 | 2026-10-03 | Appeals Court | VyianSSantiago v The State appeal withdrawn · demotion dispute · no counts charged · dismissal without merits The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and the demotion is not set aside because the appellant withdrew the appeal and no merits determination was made. |
THE APPEAL IS DISMIS… |
| JMO-0070 | 2026-09-24 | Appeals Court | dododo1977 v The State Withdrawn with the approval of the court |
WITHDRAWN |
| JMO-0050 | 2026-09-13 | Appeals Court | MissVexlyn v The State Thrown out before trial |
THROWN OUT BEFORE TR… |
| JMO-0043 | 2026-09-09 | Appeals Court | MaybeVyian v The State Criminal appeal · 1.1.4 Failure to Comply · conviction entered without service, counsel or hearing · 8.1.3 · the materiality test · fresh evidence under 8.1.2 · self-contradiction in the findings · quashing and remittal · dissent The appellant, one of four Commandants appointed for the portrait burning parade of 5 September 2026, was convicted in JMO-0041 under 1.1.4 Failure to Comply and sentenced to a penance. The complaint was filed at 00:39 on 6 September and judgement was entered at 14:48 on 7 September. |
APPEAL ALLOWED. THE … |
| JMO-0045 | 2026-09-09 | Appeals Court | larpations v The State Three appeals by one man consolidated for judgement · divisional blacklist after an approved discharge · a commander bound by his own approval · 8.1.5 and the reservation of sentencing · 1.1.4 and the chain of command · 1.1.5 command misconduct · adverse inference from the silence of a called party · 1.1.4 failure to comply by absence · the materiality test for a procedural defect · parity of tariff between co offenders · a sentence instrument reciting a ground the judgement did not find · dissents The appellant brought three matters before this Ministry within two days, and the Court consolidated them so that one man's conduct in one week should be judged once. The first is an appeal against a blacklist imposed on him by the Gendarmeric Division after that Division's own commander had approved his discharge. |
THREE MATTERS CONSOL… |
| JMO-0046 | 2026-09-09 | Appeals Court | Voraius v The State Appeal against a liquidation entry · executive act of the Inquisition without charge, case number or trial · rectification of a record rather than review of a sentence · restoration proved by the State's own registers · annotation and not expungement The appellant complained that the published record shows him liquidated although he says he was pardoned. He filed nothing in support. |
APPEAL ALLOWED IN PA… |
| JMO-0036 | 2026-09-01 | Appeals Court | Bardamcz v The State Withdrawn by the party that brought it |
WITHDRAWN |
| JMO-0035 | 2026-08-30 | Appeals Court | CastilloKHorrigan v The State Withdrawn with the approval of the court |
WITHDRAWN |
The public law database of the Imperium of Octavium. Laws passed by the Senate and the decisions of the courts enter this register automatically. No sign-in is required.